I'm the type of person who delivers more with restrictions. The point for me is, the less, the easier. A couple of VSTi licenses I still have but that's alright. I therefore sold my Ableton Suite license, MaxMSP, Reaktor 5 and Logic. When I bought Reason last year, I had to think long and hard because, for simplicity, I wanted to focus on one program only. And i'll also have to change my way of working. But I'm a little scared after having spent so much money on RE, to be tempted to spend at least as much money for vsts. The main reason for this purchase is that I want reaktor 6. Same for me, after some searches I finally bought studio one 3, I'm still waiting for transfer license. Looking to broaden my horizons in the daw world. I'm looking purchase another daw and don't know much a lot about vet and rewire as well. I hope they won't get rid of it!Ĭlone wrote:Does Logic have vst capabilities? It has that 90s workstation sound that we would otherwise have to request as a RE (Korg M1, Akai. Having said that, I find the Reason stock library for NN19 great because it's so old it has almost become vintage. I would find it most helpful to have a little bank of presets for each of the oscillators to showcase the character of each (Casio CZ, Yamaha FM, PPG, Analog whatever.). Let's take Thor and its multi oscillators as an example. Obviously there should be a category 'electrophone' for sounds that are twisted enough to have lost any traditional physical property.Īnother thing that would help, would be to reduce the presets to the basics. It may also be a good solution (something I did to organise my wav sample libraries) to follow the Sachs-Hornbostel system:Įven though I guess that might sound unintelligible to most, I find it much more meaningful in comparison to categories like 'Poly' or 'Lead'. I know it's a bit controversial in the context of synthesisers where one should be motivated to explore new dimensions of sound design and not always reproduce traditional acoustic instruments, but I believe the reference is a good starting point to know for instance, if it's a plucked type of sound rather than a blown instrument. Regarding stock patches, I think I can identify where the issue lays: I find much more logical to have banks organised by traditional instrument categories such as brass, bass, woodwinds, strings etc. Now that it has Alchemy with spectral/additive etc etc. It's overall a great program and nothing beats it at 199€.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |